One wet, windy winter’s day, I took refuge in
the 11th Century fortified Basilica of Valère, high above the city
of Sion in Switzerland. It’s a national
treasure. The visit revealed a gem in
its Treasury. A long-forgotten cleric
from the Middle-Ages had left a Latin graffito on the wall: translated it means:
“Humility is the pinnacle of wisdom and
the mother of virtue”.
Humility has been out of fashion for a while. It’s partly the cult of celebrity, with superficial
appearances - assertiveness, drive, social graces and apparent success - eclipsing
evaluation of skills, experience, character and the role of luck in track
records. It doesn’t help that those who
choose leaders often lack self-awareness of their psychological biases, and an
understanding of the pivotal role of character in decision-making, let alone the
analytical skills and the experience needed to make good leadership
choices.
When I first praised humility in leaders, my audience’s
initial reaction was gently mocking. ‘Leaders need self-confidence’, they
said, implying that humility and self-confidence are incompatible.
The truth is that leaders do need self-confidence, but
self-confidence comes in different flavours.
One that seems widespread among high profile leaders in
business and especially in politics is the robust, even hubristic leader whose
self-confidence is like a lobster’s carapace: tough armour that protects a vulnerable
interior. These often egotistical, hubristic and
insecure individuals see high pay as an endorsement of their fragile self-worth.
They can feel their very identity is at risk if their thinking is questioned, let alone if they are given news that things are not going according to plan. It isn’t that they lack intelligence but rather that to accept they may have made an error undermines their self-esteem. So they attack. They sack dissenters and surround themselves with sycophantic acolytes. This drives unwelcome news and insights underground so they don’t learn about problems until it is too late. They and their organisations, whether commercial or political, become brittle, vulnerable to failure for reasons that subordinates and outsiders can often see coming years ahead.
They can feel their very identity is at risk if their thinking is questioned, let alone if they are given news that things are not going according to plan. It isn’t that they lack intelligence but rather that to accept they may have made an error undermines their self-esteem. So they attack. They sack dissenters and surround themselves with sycophantic acolytes. This drives unwelcome news and insights underground so they don’t learn about problems until it is too late. They and their organisations, whether commercial or political, become brittle, vulnerable to failure for reasons that subordinates and outsiders can often see coming years ahead.
But there is a deeper kind of self-confidence. There are equally
bright and ambitious leaders who know and accept that they will sometimes get
things wrong. They understand and credit
the role of luck in their successes. Echoing the Tao Te Ching's telling of Lao Tzu's wisdom from 600BC, they “consider those who point out [their] faults
as [their] most benevolent teachers.” More recently Jim Collins observed that these often self-effacing
yet successful individuals deflect adulation and channel any egotistical needs
away from themselves and into making their organisations great.
Their self-confidence is not a mask to camouflage insecurity
but a strong edifice built on acceptance of their strengths, their limits and their
weaknesses. While few welcome being wrong, these leaders are receptive of
contradiction and keen to use the insights of others to remedy weaknesses and correct
errors before harm is caused. They thank
their ‘teachers’ before analysing whether things are on a good track. They
surround themselves with people who have different perspectives and encourage all
around them to say what they really think.
The result is colleagues and subordinates who promptly pass on unwelcome
news and are both competent and willing to challenge what may be errors.
Their organisations are intrinsically resilient because, through their openness to different perspectives, challenge and bad news, they gain early warning of things that may be going wrong in time to avoid or mitigate bad consequences.
The reason that graffito grabbed my attention was a recent Financial
Times job advertisement by Russel Reynolds.
It described the successful candidate as one who exemplifies, amongst
other traits, humility and integrity. One
swallow does not make a summer, but this is a powerful pair of character traits
in a leader. Boards - and investment
managers’ governance teams - would do well to develop that line of thinking.
Anthony Fitzsimmons
Author of "Rethinking Reputational Risk: How to Manage the Risks that can Ruin Your Business, Your Reputation and You"
Reputability
Author of "Rethinking Reputational Risk: How to Manage the Risks that can Ruin Your Business, Your Reputation and You"
Reputability
London
No comments:
Post a Comment